<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Glenn Beck Slams Sarah Palin In Sexist Way?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wisepolitics.com/glenn-beck-slams-sarah-palin-in-sexist-way-1069.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wisepolitics.com/glenn-beck-slams-sarah-palin-in-sexist-way-1069.html</link>
	<description>200% Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 22:26:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: hassan</title>
		<link>http://www.wisepolitics.com/glenn-beck-slams-sarah-palin-in-sexist-way-1069.html/comment-page-1#comment-978</link>
		<dc:creator>hassan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 17:21:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wisepolitics.com/?p=1069#comment-978</guid>
		<description>It is not &quot;Is it sexual or that it is true.&quot; Whether or not he was right about the qualifications of Palin (which in itself is ridiculous because, he claimed that he is more qualified than two) do not have any impact on his biased against women. You can be both a distinction between the sexes and the right, but any of the facts does not negate the part of sexism. 

I&#039;m not even Palin fan and I recognize sexism in comments Beck</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is not &#8220;Is it sexual or that it is true.&#8221; Whether or not he was right about the qualifications of Palin (which in itself is ridiculous because, he claimed that he is more qualified than two) do not have any impact on his biased against women. You can be both a distinction between the sexes and the right, but any of the facts does not negate the part of sexism. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not even Palin fan and I recognize sexism in comments Beck</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hassan</title>
		<link>http://www.wisepolitics.com/glenn-beck-slams-sarah-palin-in-sexist-way-1069.html/comment-page-1#comment-977</link>
		<dc:creator>hassan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 17:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wisepolitics.com/?p=1069#comment-977</guid>
		<description>It never is not valid</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It never is not valid</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alana</title>
		<link>http://www.wisepolitics.com/glenn-beck-slams-sarah-palin-in-sexist-way-1069.html/comment-page-1#comment-942</link>
		<dc:creator>alana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 19:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wisepolitics.com/?p=1069#comment-942</guid>
		<description>It’s not “is he a sexist or is he right.” Whether or not he’s right in regards to Palin’s qualifications (which in and of itself is ridiculous because he claims he is the more qualified of the two) has no bearing on his sexist comments. You can be both sexist and right, but any factual correctness on his part does not negate his sexism.

I’m not even a Palin fan and I can recognize the sexism in Beck’s comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s not “is he a sexist or is he right.” Whether or not he’s right in regards to Palin’s qualifications (which in and of itself is ridiculous because he claims he is the more qualified of the two) has no bearing on his sexist comments. You can be both sexist and right, but any factual correctness on his part does not negate his sexism.</p>
<p>I’m not even a Palin fan and I can recognize the sexism in Beck’s comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

