David

#1: @qvcc: You must have never been a friend to them or you have no idea what friendship is!

#2: I bet you all believe that World Trade Center #7 (which fell at “Free-Fall” speed) just decided to collapse in on itself from those little fires that were burning.

#3: How can people get burned in the basement (3 stories down) when the plane hit the upper floors?

#4: 3000 people were murdered and in any “normal” investigation you need evidence to prosecute?…….Sorry, all evidence is gone shipped overseas and destroyed. Basically 3000 people will not have the same investigation that someone that steals a candy bar gets. I believe 3000 family’s have a right for an investigation.

Don’t take my word for it. Look it up and listen to those Firefighters that say (on live TV) that there were a lot of secondary explosions going off.

“Do your OWN research” Don’t believe ANYONE but YOU!!!

David.

Where did Beck get all the information he automatically accepted as unadulterated fact to be so stubborn that his view of 911 is the absolute truth on the matter? How can anyone claim to “know the absolute truth” about any event if legitimate questions, that can’t be directly and thoughtfully answered by anyone, can’t be asked, by anyone?

911. When I read about the Israeli shipping company that moved out of the World Trade Center weeks earlier, breaking a 99-year lease, paying a $50K penalty to do so, and then seeing the welcoming proclamation by then-governor Gilmore for that same company into Virginia’s enterprise zone, that, coupled with the five Israeli agents that were arrested right after the attack by the police across the bay from the towers, after a housewife called the police based upon their strange behavior on top of a white van during the attack, and then the five were deported a day or so later and all information about them and their arrest was of “national security interest” informaiton that was sealed, I knew there had to be more to 911 than the official story.

Plus, an acquaitence was a past traffic controller for the military during his career. According to that person it would have been next to impossible for those planes to be flying around for over 15 minutes without the scrambling of fighters to intercept them. To me, it seems awful similar to a modern day Pearl Harbor scenario without doubt. Just don’t ask any questions, because questions automatically make you a “conspiracy theorist,” that is, in Beck’s view, a “nut.”

How could anyone determne what the truth is about any of these events, like Waco, 911, etc., when the aftermath evidence is immediately destroyed or covered up, if not sooner, and is buried or used to make a new ship for the Navy? Who shot Kennedy? Does anyone really know today? NO. But, anyone who ever shot an animal with a high powered rifle knows that plenty of guts, like those in the picture of Kennedy’s head on the operating room table, hang out from the exit wound of the bullet, not the entrance hole. I still, to this day, have not seen anything but distinct holes where bullets have entered bodies, and gaping holes and guts hanging out of the large irregular exit wound.

The problem we have today is that the “foxes and their co-conspirators are guarding the hen house,” for their own benefit, not our collective benefit or welfare as a nation.

Beck can ask questions, as can any journalist or media personality. It would certainly help, however, if the sort of questions get asked that focus on and are relevant to the serious issues in Texas that Debra Medina is dedicated to resolving. Rick Perry’s tentacles have been far reaching and a lot of so-called conservatives (including Sarah Palin) do not have a clue as to what has really been going on in this state and have gotten snowed. While Beck does have the right to ask any questions he wants, listeners and viewers also have the right to protest when solid, staunch conservative candidates are queried about matters that have nothing to do with the serious problems Texas has under the present governorship. It would sure be helpful if those who cannot seriously help us solve our problems would just get out of the way.

Beck lied from the start of the interview by saying he didn’t know who she was. Obviously by the line of questions beck asked, he had an agenda. Beck has accused the Obama admistration of every crime imaginable whether it could be proven or not– but somehow beck’s’s set up a 9/11 litmus test. Beck is no arbiter of truth. He’ an uneducated, former drug addict that has somehow made his way into the mainstream, but as a fool. Beck has shown himself to be a hypocrite and neocon shill.
. Beck is constantly wrailing against Obama, but everyone has to buy into the 9/11 cover story without question? I don’t think so.
This is America, we can have questions about our govt and their actions and still hold political office. Beck is foolish–and Medina will win, god willing.